Watch out : it only works on Mountain Lion (10.8.2) but not on Snow Leopard or Lion.Satechi - Type-C Aluminum Stand and Hub for Apple Mac Mini 2018 - USB-C Data Port, Micro/SD Card Readers, USB 3.0 & Headphone Jack. SIMULTANEOUS SD and MICRO SD ACCESS USB C multiport adapter provides both a SDSDHCSDXC and a MicroSD card reader for additional data storage or backup and provides access to both simultaneously FAST CHARGE PORTS Portable docking station w3x USB 3.0 Type A ports support BC 1.2 1.5A fast charge to charge tablets or smartphones on any one of the ports wUSB C power adapter and laptop Seagate Slim for Mac (500GB, USB 3.0) overview and full product specs on CNET. Award Winners Best 5G Phone Best Antivirus Best Balance Transfer Credit Card Best Cash -Back Credit Cards Best. It is possible to install a 3.0 USB card on a Mac Pro or MacBook Pro, and to make it directly recognized by Mac OS X.Featuring driver-free installation and automatic input detection for true plug-and-play operation, our USB Capture dongles are the easiest way to bring video and audio signals into popular Windows, Mac, Linux and Chrome software. USB 3.0 Connectivity for Data & Power. Our single-channel USB Capture devices enable all types of computers.With a newer device like the 2011 17-inch MacBook Pro, or newer Mac Pro, it should work on PCI-Express 2.0 (500 MB/s).With a LaCie USB key, I write at 40 MB/s and read at ~150 MB/s, the same as on the 2012 MacBook Air.With a SSD in a good USB 3.0 box, I reach a maximum of ~150 MB/s, which seems to be the limit of the PCI Express bus. This is slower than an internal controller (I reach about 400 MB/s on a MacBook Air), but much faster than with USB 2.0 or with FireWire 800.A $ 20 card for a Mac Pro, the investment is worth. Enjoy copying videos, music, photos, data files between USB devices and the computer at blazing fast speedsI tested it this morning with a card equipped with a controller Fresco, fully compatible xHCI, and it works perfectly, for just $ 20.With easy installation, simple solution for your Mac Pro. Enjoy copying videos, music, photos, data files between USB devices and the computer at blazing fast speeds. 0 supports transfer rates of up to 5Gbps - The actual transmission speed is limited by the setting of the device connected.The choice of the card is important: there are many USB 3.0 controllers on the market and you need a controller fully compatible with USB 3.0 (xHCI). Controller cards based on NEC chips do not work, the cards based on Fresco chips work.And thanks to USB 3.0’s availability on almost all shipping Macs (and, in the case of the Mac Pro, something you can add via a PCI card), its bootability (since late 2005—but what can I say, I can hold a grudge), its improved performance, and its relatively low price, my bias is quickly disappearing. (Though the first certified USB 3.0 consumer devices were announced at the Consumer Electronics Show in 2010, Macs didn’t begin shipping with USB 3.0 ports until June 2012, when new MacBook Air and MacBook Pro models were released.) USB-IFUSB 3.0 (also known as SuperSpeed USB) has a maximum bandwidth rate of 5 gbps (gigabits per second). And booting from a USB drive on the Mac was a no-no for a long time.Times have changed, however. But a hard drive connected via USB has always been slow compared to those using Apple’s FireWire, FireWire 800, and (most recently) Thunderbolt interfaces. As a Mac user, I’ve never been a big fan of USB for storage. (20)Sellers do not always indicate the controller used, so be careful.In my case, I tested a card on a 17-inch MacBook Pro 17, in an ExpressCard box to PCI-Express. It will work on a Mac Pro, on PCI Express directly or – more simply – with an ExpressCard.
Usb 3.0 Cards Install A 3Hard-drive testsFor our first test, we used a bus-powered, 2.5-inch Hitachi 750GB, 7200-rpm hard drive and ran a series of tests with it connected over USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 directly to our MacBook Pro. We also tested USB 2.0 and FireWire 800 speeds for comparison. To give the tests the best chance of success, we connected the USB 3.0 drives to a 2012 15-inch MacBook Pro with a 2.7GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 processor, 8GB of RAM, and a speedy internal SSD drive installed. So we ran a slew of tests using both spinning and solid-state drives that had a variety of interfaces and were plugged in both directly to a computer and through a USB 3.0 hub. On paper, that’s twice as fast as USB 3.0, but how fast is Thunderbolt really? Also, you’ll currently you pay quite a premium for Thunderbolt (often an extra $100 or more for a drive of the same capacity) and USB 3.0 ports offer backward compatibility with USB 2.0 devices.We wanted to see if USB 3.0 lives up to its hype, and if Thunderbolt is in fact a faster alternative. In this case, USB 2.0 was the bottleneck.USB 3.0 speeds, on the other hand, definitely benefited from the faster performance of the SSD. We saw the same 40-MBps scores across all tests, with or without the hub. Again, USB 2.0 results were slow and consistent. The Aja System Test Write scores were a little slower with the Hitachi drive connected directly to a USB 3.0 port on the MacBook Pro—107.2 MBps through the Belkin hub, the score was 106.1 MBps, and with the StarTech hub, the score was 102.5 MBps.To try and remove the spinning-hard-drive bottleneck, we ran the same tests, but with an OWC Mercury Extreme Pro 6G SSD as the external drive. It was 35 percent faster than USB 3.0 at writing our 10GB folder of files, 17 percent faster at reading those files, 14 percent faster at reading our large 10GB file, and a scant 6 percent faster at writing that file. Results were much faster than USB 2.0, but could not keep up with USB 3.0, which was always at least twice as fast as FireWire 800, and in the case of our 10GB file and Aja Write tests, USB 3.0 was three times as fast as FireWire 800.Thunderbolt was much faster on these SSD tests than it was with the hard drive, and it was faster than USB 3.0 in all six tasks, though to varying degrees. IDGFireWire 800 results were flat compared to the hard-drive tests except for the 10GB folder write test: At 62.8 MBps, it was 7.7 MBps faster than it was with the spinning drive. The slowest score for USB 3.0 and the SSD was for writing the folder of many small files, which it did at 144.7 MBps. Aja and file-read test results were a little slower—167 MBps—while reading a folder with 10GB of smaller files took just about 160 MBps. We saw similar results with Aja System Test’s write tests. Serif drawplus starter edition registration keyThe Thunderbolt-connected drive posted a write score of 355 MBps and a read score of 370 MBps, as compared to the 193.2 MBps write and 167.6 MBps read scores USB 3.0 posted using Aja System Test.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMatt ArchivesCategories |